While it’s been orchestrated with some skill and even intelligence, a question still pokes at the viewer, like rusty scissors jabbing at soft flesh: What’s the point of a less extreme version of a film whose whole raison d’être was extremity?
What are people saying?
What are critics saying?
RogerEbert.com by Brian Tallerico
Whether you're new to Inside or a fan of the original, the change that Vivas and his team do make to the ending will leave you scratching your head.
At best competently mounted and at worst a case study in watering down chaos for an American market.
The Hollywood Reporter by Frank Scheck
Lacking the star power that might have drawn American audiences who haven't seen the far superior original, Inside has no reason for being.
We Got This Covered by Matt Donato
This year's Inside remake swaps Bustillo and Maury's brutalization levels for beyond-generic thrills that are more frustrating than fierce - whatever that's worth.
Los Angeles Times by Noel Murray
None of this amounts to much. The original had some squirmy points to make about femininity and motherhood that this Inside lacks. But the movie works on a gut level … as in, "Sharp blades are scary when they're pointed at a pregnant belly."