Only mildly interesting.
We hate to say it, but we can't find anywhere to view this film.
What are people saying?
What are critics saying?
Christian Science Monitor by David Sterritt
Energetic acting and directing make it a less exasperating experience than it might have been.
As exasperating as it is insightful. The film ultimately falters, though, because it's so resolutely old-fashioned.
Talky, overlong and, ultimately, just as predictable and repetitive as the maddening relationship it depicts.
Chicago Reader by Jonathan Rosenbaum
A must-see.
TV Guide Magazine by Maitland McDonagh
Catches you with a creepy sucker punch.
San Francisco Chronicle by Mick LaSalle
It's a movie about an idiot in the grip of something common place. He starts off as a garden-variety idiot and progresses to a big idiot.
Seattle Post-Intelligencer by Sean Axmaker
Kahn manages to turn his feast of flesh, navel-gazing talk and self-destructive jealousy into a thoughtful reflection on the subject.
The New York Times by Stephen Holden
Overly schematic, not always believable in its crude sexual mechanics and ultimately unsensual. But it lays out the laws of erotic attraction with a brutal directness that is downright scary.
San Francisco Examiner by Wesley Morris
There's enough sexual manic depression to justify house calls from Dr. Laura.