The imposing Sean Connery lends an undeserved dignity to A Good Man in Africa, an otherwise unpleasant and cringe-worthy cinematic botch of William Boyd's 1981 novel about the misadventures of British diplomats in a newly independent West African nation.
What are people saying?
What are critics saying?
With its widely acclaimed source material and a cast of distinguished actors, A Good Man in Africa held the possibility of being a welcome departure from the ordinary. Instead, ordinary is what it rises to at its best.
ReelViews by James Berardinelli
The problem with the film is that it's frequently more tedious than funny.
Unforgivably terrible.
It stakes out Our Man in Havana territory in its ironic tone, but it's not nearly as humorous or as successful in delivering up a satisfying soupcon of caustic wit. Commercial prospects are tepid for what's essentially a shaggy dog story.
Entertainment Weekly by Lisa Schwarzbaum
Disappointingly tired, unfunny, and disengaged.
San Francisco Chronicle by Mick LaSalle
Connery's charm and integrity make all his scenes worthwhile, and Lithgow's stiff-backed turn as the classic British imperialist is in good fun.
Rolling Stone by Peter Travers
Based on William Boyd's 1981 novel, the film has a touch of Evelyn Waugh — though the satire is served dry, it has still got a kick.
Chicago Sun-Times by Roger Ebert
I was not bored during A Good Man in Africa. Just uncomfortable, as the characters thrashed about in search of a purpose.