60
The film has enough originality to interest demanding fans of the genre.
We hate to say it, but we can't find anywhere to view this film.
What are people saying?
What are critics saying?
50
Philadelphia Inquirer by Carrie Rickey
The characters are (hand-painted) so flat that the film looks like a paper-doll convention at Epcot.
50
The New York Times by Dana Stevens
While there are some genuinely dazzling moments of visual bravura, the marriage of flatness and depth that Mr. Aramaki attempts doesn't quite work.
40
The film's snazzy new automated animation style falls short: The supposedly human face of our metal-plated robocop's partner -- the inevitable curvy female in a leather jump suit -- is an inexpressive, glossy doll mask, untouched by human hands.
40
Much of the movie is dull, and as it has been dubbed into English, the blah-blah is impossible to ignore.
50
The stock characters and leaden stretches of expository dialogue are welcome evidence that there's still no computer program capable of telling a decent story.
40
Los Angeles Times by Kevin Thomas
Dazzling visually but is flattened by corny dialogue better suited to the 1936 "Flash Gordon" serial, a needlessly hard to follow plot and heavy-handed exposition clotted with pseudo-scientific mumbo jumbo.
50
Entertainment Weekly by Owen Gleiberman
At this point, there's something almost masochistic about the way animators in Japan use cheesy ''Westernized'' heroes to fuel their fantasies.
40
The A.V. Club by Tasha Robinson
Its busy, stiff, artificial graphics are a perfect match for its busy, stiff, artificial plot. A simple Shirow pinup parade might almost be preferable.