70
The New York Times by A.O. Scott
Lovely, uncomplicated though limited movie.
We hate to say it, but we can't find anywhere to view this film.
What are people saying?
What are critics saying?
100
Christian Science Monitor by David Sterritt
Blurring all the lines between fiction and documentary, this gentle and amusing movie blends real, unrehearsed material with delightful storytelling scenes.
80
The film spins a beguiling web of detail that builds to a surprisingly throat-clutching finish.
70
The Hollywood Reporter by Frank Scheck
The leisurely narrative is barely able to sustain the film's full-length running time, and some of the obviously staged sequences involving the family of shepherds are annoyingly hokey. Nonetheless, "Weeping Camel" has an undeniable appeal.
88
New York Daily News by Jami Bernard
Even the hardest heart must melt in the face of The Story of the Weeping Camel.
90
Beyond its rare visions of remote vistas, Camel's great charm lies in its seeming simplicity. The camera records the events of the day -- from a little girl's tears to an afternoon sandstorm -- with a childlike clarity and curiosity.
91
Entertainment Weekly by Lisa Schwarzbaum
The vivid fictional specifics, and the simple loveliness of the artless performances by nonactor Mongolian nomads, attest to the filmmakers' abundant artistry.
75
A rare film offering from Mongolia, is an unusual, captivating and crowd-pleasing semi-documentary about an extended family of camel herders -- and two of their flock.
60
TV Guide Magazine by Maitland McDonagh
Davaa and Falorni's film does suggest that camels have inner lives as rich and complicated as the human beings with whom they live in such intimate proximity. But they're also wholly camels, matted, goopy-eyed, gritty with sand and quick to knee an adorable calf in the snout when its demands become annoying.
80
The family's few lines of dialogue are so integral to advancing the story that they may well have been scripted, but it's not that important whether The Story Of The Weeping Camel is more fiction than objective ethnography. If anything, the contrast between what's real and what may have been faked only adds to the tension between the natural world and encroaching modernism.