The Wandering Earth II | Telescope Film
The Wandering Earth II

The Wandering Earth II (流浪地球2)

Critic Rating

(read reviews)

User Rating

Humans built huge engines on the surface of the Earth to find a new home, but the road to the universe is perilous. To save Earth, young people once again have to step forward to start a race against time for life and death.

Stream The Wandering Earth II

What are critics saying?

78

Austin Chronicle by Matthew Monagle

It is this combination of maximalism, nationalism, fatalism, and two-dimensional characterization that makes this one of the most enjoyable current franchises.

75

RogerEbert.com by Simon Abrams

Somehow, The Wandering Earth II never feels tonally unbalanced or narratively convoluted, partly because Gwo and his collaborators keep their movie’s plot focused on feats of action-adventure heroism.

61

Polygon by Jesse Hassenger

It is remarkable that his three-hour Wandering Earth prequel is simultaneously stranger and more emotionally grounded than the earlier film. Yet even at this length, even with eye-popping moments and believable characters, some crucial humanity feels missing.

60

Screen Daily by John Berra

There is certainly much to admire about this ambitious homegrown sci-fi saga, even if it feels rather protracted with the running time clocking in 45 minutes longer than its predecessor.

50

Movie Nation by Roger Moore

The Wandering Earth II is even bigger, more sprawling and more daffy in its Big Science. It’s got a few first act jokes before turning somber, dogged and yet never fatalistic. It’s also more cluttered and more pointed in its Chinese messaging. So naturally it’s almost an hour longer than the two hour original.

40

The Guardian by Phuong Le

At nearly three hours long, The Wandering Earth II is packed with expository science talk, which gets more convoluted and tiring as the clock ticks on.

30

The New York Times by Brandon Yu

Losing all of the glee of its predecessor, the movie instead offers nearly three hours of convoluted story lines, undercooked themes and a tangle of confused, glaringly state-approved political subtext.