Legend | Telescope Film
Legend

Legend

Critic Rating

(read reviews)

User Rating

In 1960s London, the Kray twins try to avoid publicity and police investigations as they orchestrate robberies carry out murders while running nightclubs and protection rackets. But their rapid rise to power leads to tabloid notoriety and police Detective Leonard "Nipper" Read hot on their heels.

Stream Legend

What are critics saying?

80

Total Film by Jamie Graham

It’s flawed, yes – Frances is frustratingly underwritten, her psychological fault lines spoken of but never shown – but it’s also swaggeringly cinematic. And it has Tom Hardy vs Tom Hardy.

80

Empire by Dan Jolin

Helgeland’s savvy new take on this well-known story proves that crime can pay, while Hardy is astonishing and magnetic in two truly towering performances.

80

Time Out London by Dave Calhoun

In what is surely his finest hour, Tom Hardy plays both brothers. Much more than a gimmick, it’s like watching one side of a mind wrestle with the other – literally, in one explosive, fun-to-unpick fight scene.

75

Entertainment Weekly by Kevin P. Sullivan

The film’s saving grace is Hardy, who is as ferocious and watchable as ever, acting smooth and brooding as Reggie and unhinged as Ronnie.

75

Movie Nation by Roger Moore

Tom Hardy manages the brilliant trick of playing two physically, emotionally and intellectually distinct mobster brothers in Legend.

70

Variety by Guy Lodge

For all Hardy’s expressive detail and physical creativity, Helgeland’s chewy, incident-packed script offers little insight into what made either of these contrasting psychopaths tick, or finally explode.

70

Village Voice by Alan Scherstuhl

Legend reminds us how easily a pretty star can get us to feel for people we'd deplore in real life — a monster's a monster, no matter how big its heart or soulful its strut.

70

The New York Times by Manohla Dargis

Tom Hardy and Tom Hardy are the reasons to see Legend.

67

The A.V. Club by Noel Murray

When the two Krays are in the same room, circling each other with a mix of fraternal affection and deep loathing, Legend is as heady and unforgettable as it means to be. The rest of the time, it’s a movie with a lot of good points, but no connecting line.

63

Rolling Stone by Peter Travers

Helgeland's script is hit-and-miss, not on the Oscar-winning level of his L.A. Confidential. Still, Hardy is a show all by himself, an actor flying without a net and having a ball. You will too.

60

The Telegraph

While he arguably fails to rein in his leading man (or half of him), screenwriter-turned-director Helgeland has a light touch, leavening the ultra-violence – and there are gory scenes – with a flair for absurdity.

60

Screen Daily by Fionnuala Halligan

It’s easy to buy Hardy’s dual performance, and it doesn’t get in the way of the film – although some actor-ly exuberance in the delivery of Ronnie can sound an off-note, with Hardy using some facial prosthetics around the jaw line which aren’t particularly subtle.

60

CineVue by Joe Walsh

Legend crucially lacks almost any sense of gravitas, although the bold and brash approach does keep you entertained.

60

Screen International by Fionnuala Halligan

It’s easy to buy Hardy’s dual performance, and it doesn’t get in the way of the film – although some actor-ly exuberance in the delivery of Ronnie can sound an off-note, with Hardy using some facial prosthetics around the jaw line which aren’t particularly subtle.

58

The Playlist by Oliver Lyttelton

It’s worth the price of admission just to see Hardy’s Reggie performance, which is up among his best work. Still, the story could have perhaps used a more inspired hand at the helm.

40

The Guardian

It’s a disappointingly shallow take on a fascinating period of time and leaves us sorely uninformed, as if we’ve skim-read a pamphlet. The legend might live on but Legend certainly won’t.

40

The Hollywood Reporter by Leslie Felperin

This ungainly portrait strikes a lot of poses, as if inviting the viewer to admire its impressive cast list, fine period detailing, "cheeky" British humor, and insouciant attitude towards violence. But none of it disguises the fact that the film is also tonally incoherent, vacuous and structurally a bleedin' mess.