40
The movie has more lags in action than either of the previous episodes, and somehow the dialogue is even more daft
What are people saying?
What are critics saying?
50
ReelViews by James Berardinelli
Transporter 3 is the most frustrating entry into a series that has never set the bar terribly high.
50
The Globe and Mail (Toronto) by Liam Lacey
If you're going to a no-frills action film, though, at least you want the action to be entertaining, which is where Transporter 3 falls down.
75
Entertainment Weekly by Lisa Schwarzbaum
The villainous Polluter-in-Chief is eloquently played by Robert Knepper, familiarly loathsome as T-Bag on Fox's "Prison Break." And when Knepper and Statham get together, there's a fine showdown of grimaces.
42
Portland Oregonian by Marc Mohan
For those disappointed in the grim, gritty feel of the latest James Bond movie and who long for the absurdity of the Roger Moore-era entries, Transporter 3, ought to fit the bill.
50
Austin Chronicle by Marc Savlov
Transporter 3 is so far over the top that it more than once spills into outright cartoonishness.
30
The Hollywood Reporter by Michael Rechtshaffen
Easily the worst in a trilogy that has been notable mainly for the presence of its everyman action star, Transporter 3 is a nonsensical, choppily edited bore, with awful dialogue.
67
In a series elevated by high-flying ridiculousness, Transporter 3 falls a couple of sequences short of the standard, but it does show off Statham's considerable dirt-biking skills. For that, at least, it's kinda rad.
58
Seattle Post-Intelligencer by Sean Axmaker
As action movies seem to get more complicated and convoluted with international conspiracies and technological concepts, the "Transporter" franchise is refreshingly simple.