Leigh builds a slight story intended to be a microcosm of today’s London.
What are people saying?
What are critics saying?
Leigh is obviously a major talent of the English film resurgence, which may already have peaked but nonetheless offers hopes of its own. His loose way of making films -- the wandering camera, the scenes that seem to invent themselves as they go along -- somehow accommodates a genuine comic intelligence, which usually requires the tightest of controls. [2 June 1989, p.7]
Leigh has fashioned a limber style of political commentary that is part documentary, part cartoon and wholly novel in the movies.
The New York Times by Janet Maslin
High Hopes manages to be enjoyably whimsical without ever losing its cutting edge.
Never settling for mere irony, High Hopes becomes a small banner of sanity and good humor among the social ruins. Leigh never shies away from his unflinching dead-end class view of contemporary London. Nor does he wallow in '60s nostalgia. Which is part of the reason his passionate, life-embracing High Hopes is so exhilarating. [31 Mar. 1989, p.30]
The Globe and Mail (Toronto) by Jay Scott
In High Hopes, Leigh regularly expresses love for the very people to whom he is putting the boot... As a satire, High Hopes is an esthetic joy. [14 April 1989]
Chicago Reader by Jonathan Rosenbaum
Leigh displays a passionate affection for and commitment to his leading characters that never precludes a critical distance.
Chicago Sun-Times by Roger Ebert
High Hopes is an alive and challenging film, one that throws our own assumptions and evasions back at us. Leigh sees his characters and their lifestyles so vividly, so mercilessly and with such a sharp satirical edge, that the movie achieves a neat trick: We start by laughing at the others, and end by feeling uncomfortable about ourselves.
Los Angeles Times by Sheila Benson
The actors, many of whom are part of a loose Mike Leigh stock company, are miraculously deft at erasing that line between performing and being.
Portland Oregonian by Ted Mahar
The characters and their situations, while perfectly credible and funny on the simplest literal level, surely add up to something like a subtly farcical apocalyptic satire. [18 April 1989, p.D4]