63
Pure nonsense is hard to sustain for an entire feature-length movie.
What are people saying?
What are critics saying?
20
The New York Times by Dana Stevens
Succumbs to its blockbuster ambitions and turns into a noisy, bloated mess.
50
San Francisco Chronicle by Edward Guthmann
So quick that the flat moments are rapidly, inevitably chased by a new gag.
10
Scarcely seems worth the expenditure of time, money and talent.
40
Austin Chronicle by Marc Savlov
Hit-or-miss comedy at its best and worst: When it connects, the belly laughs are long and loud, but when it misses, the groans you'll be hearing are your own.
40
Washington Post by Michael O'Sullivan
Never asks its target audience of self-referential baby boomers and their littles bundles of joy to take it more seriously than it takes itself.
42
Entertainment Weekly by Owen Gleiberman
The problem with the movie isn't that it sells out Rocky and Bullwinkle -- it's that it can't keep up with them.
75
Chicago Sun-Times by Roger Ebert
Has the same mixture of dumb puns, corny sight gags and sly, even sophisticated in-jokes. It's a lot of fun.
30
Has some good throwaway gags -- but far too often, the moviemakers don't throw them away soon enough.
50
TV Guide Magazine by Steve Simels
This megastar mix of CGI animation and live action is remarkably faithful to the spirit of the original.