60
The art direction and costumes are gorgeous and finely detailed, and Kurys' direction is clever and insightful. Even so, it feels very, very long.
We hate to say it, but we can't find anywhere to view this film.
What are people saying?
What are critics saying?
70
The New York Times by Dana Stevens
Though well dressed and well made, ultimately falls prey to the contradiction that afflicts so many movies about writers. What makes them so fascinating, so representative, cannot really be shown on screen.
40
Juliette Binoche is the only reason to see Diane Kurys' florid, incoherent movie.
40
TV Guide Magazine by Frank Lovece
Never has the adage "You can't help who you fall in love with" been more lavishly illustrated than in this historical drama.
63
New York Daily News by Jack Mathews
Inexplicable human bondage is a literary staple of film as well as literature, but Kurys ("Entre Nous"), usually so sure-handed with her actors, has trouble making this bond compelling.
60
Chicago Reader by Jonathan Rosenbaum
As a literary bodice ripper this is better than average, partly because of its glimpses of early-19th-century bohemianism in France and Italy but mostly because Juliette Binoche and Benoit Magimel manage to keep the story hot and unpredictable.
60
It does best when it leaves behind hothouse literary discussions and closes in on these two legendary behemoths, battling for sexual supremacy.
75
In between all the emotional seesawing, it's hard to figure the depth of these two literary figures, and even the times in which they lived. But they fascinate in their recklessness.
88
Chicago Tribune by Michael Wilmington
A romance incandescent, a fiery pageant of l'amour fou. Whatever its historical transgressions, it opens up a vein and lets life and blood pour out.
75
San Francisco Chronicle by Mick LaSalle
The film's appeal has a lot to do with the casting of Juliette Binoche as Sand, who brings to the role her pale, dark beauty and characteristic warmth.