67
Neeson's performance as the legendary Irishman reminds us of how large a presence the actor is: He fills up the frame with his voice, his hands, and his gestures.
What are people saying?
What are critics saying?
50
San Francisco Examiner by Barbara Shulgasser
A filmmaker of Jordan's capability is not likely to make anything less than a competent, watchable movie, and that Michael Collins is. I think content rather than form detracts from the cogency of the finished product in this case.
50
Christian Science Monitor by David Sterritt
Liam Neeson and Alan Rickman give sturdy performances, but Neil Jordan's historically based drama seems oddly cool and distant with regard to its incendiary subject.
70
The New York Times by Elvis Mitchell
The film itself works eagerly to emphasize the frankly entertaining aspects of its story.
88
ReelViews by James Berardinelli
Putting aside all the controversy, however, viewers are left with an expertly-directed and well-acted historical epic that disappoints only in its shallow perspective of the Irish/British and Irish/Irish conflicts.
20
Chicago Reader by Jonathan Rosenbaum
An epic about the Irish patriot (Liam Neeson) during the last years of his life (1916-'22), it clearly represents a lot of thought on Jordan's part, yet it's dramatic and cinematic sludge.
90
Los Angeles Times by Kenneth Turan
This is an extremely cinematic, beautifully made David Lean-type epic, helped by fluid and involving camera work by two-time Oscar-winning ("The Killing Fields," "The Mission") cinematographer Chris Menges.
50
San Francisco Chronicle by Peter Stack
Viewers may feel let down because the depth promised by the movie's visual artistry is never quite delivered.
75
Chicago Sun-Times by Roger Ebert
The movie moves confidently when it focuses on Collins and his best friend and co-strategist Harry Boland (Aidan Quinn). But it falters with the unnecessary character of Kitty Kiernan (Julia Roberts), who is in love with both men, and they with her.